A recent trading competition that attracted a lot of attention has sparked considerable doubt. Some participants noticed confusing fluctuations in the competition data. Specifically, the total trading volume two days ago reached 911 million, with about 70,000 new users. However, yesterday, the total trading volume suddenly dropped to around 497 million, while the number of new users unusually rose to 77,000.

This unreasonable fluctuation in data has raised doubts about the authenticity of the competition. Based on the current situation of 10,250 participants, the lowest trading amount yesterday should have been around 789 million. However, the actual announced total trading amount is far from this estimate.

What is even more puzzling is that despite the significant decrease in the total transaction volume, the number of new users has shown an abnormal increase. This anomalous phenomenon has led many to suspect whether there is any manipulation of data.

Some analyses suggest that if the current trend continues, there could be around 600,000 new users by the end of the competition. The reasonableness of this figure has also been questioned.

In the face of these unusual data, more and more participants and observers are beginning to ask: Who is behind the manipulation of this data? Has the credibility of this trading competition been seriously affected?

This event has also sparked widespread discussions about the authenticity of data from similar online trading activities. How to ensure the fairness and transparency of such competitions has become a serious issue that the industry needs to think about and solve.