Recently, while playing a Blockchain game, I encountered some confusing situations. Two days ago, the game suddenly started requiring facial recognition. However, today when I attempted to do a facial pre-check, the system did not ask me to scan my face and just showed that I passed. Even stranger, just two minutes later, when claiming Airdrop rewards, the system again required facial recognition.

This situation raises questions: as a real user, using the same device, the same IP address, and not even changing location, why is the system determining that there is an anomaly? While it is necessary to crack down on studio botting behavior, is it a bit excessive to frequently conduct facial recognition checks on real users?

This erratic verification mechanism not only affects the gaming experience but also raises doubts about the stability and reliability of the system. As a blockchain game, ensuring fairness and preventing cheating are certainly important, but the experience of real users should also be taken into account. Too frequent and unstable verification mechanisms may lower user engagement and even lead to user attrition.

Perhaps game developers need to reassess their anti-cheat systems to find a balance that effectively combats cheating while not excessively disturbing normal users. For example, they could consider optimizing algorithms to improve the accuracy of anomaly detection, or adopting smarter verification mechanisms to reduce interference with real users.

Overall, this issue reflects the challenge of balancing user experience and security in blockchain games. It is hoped that with technological advancements, such issues can be better resolved, providing players with a smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.